- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:59:27 -0700
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 June 2014 23:04, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >>Sadly we are not. We are responsible here for accommodating the uses >>of HTTP that exist. We're not dictators, we're curators. > > "the uses" or only "some of the uses" ? > > Is high performance load-balancing in the set of uses "we are > responsible for accomodating" ? Yes, and I'm sensitive to your arguments. >>As such, we can't unilaterally impose restrictions like this. > > My proposal for jumboframes contain no restrictions that differ from > restrictions in HTTP/1. And your proposal is a perfectly reasonable one.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 16:59:55 UTC