Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

On 25 June 2014 12:52, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
>
> So if we can boot efficient transfer of large payloads to an extension, can
> be we also punt large headers to an extension?

That's an obvious and reasonable question.  I've heard enough interest
in having large header field values that I think that this would be a
little too aggressive.

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 20:04:03 UTC