- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:58:07 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 16/06/14 17:38, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 16 June 2014 00:27, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: >> Reading the title without understanding the context will let people guess >> that this is about encrypting the URIs themselves. What about something like >> "Opportunistic Encryption for Retrieval of HTTP URIs" or so? > > > A fair comment. I'd be happier with "Opportunistic Encryption for > HTTP". It's not like we need to specifically structure the title to > avoid inadvertently saying something about https URIs. If bikeshedding on the title, can I suggest opportunistic security or opportunistic TLS instead of opportunistic encryption? Either would be more consistent with the terminology being discussed in uta and saag. Not a huge deal, but someone will undoubtedly bring it up later for sure if you keep it as is. Cheers, S. > > >
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 16:58:50 UTC