- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 12:50:13 +0000
- To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "C.Brunhuber@iaea.org" <C.Brunhuber@iaea.org>
In message <CAH_hAJEcBtjxu=oyjiMRTCmFrQY7ZwOem9BauHsxFFSUZCHpCg@mail.gmail.com> , Cory Benfield writes: >I think that ship has sailed. > >[...] > >Certainly, in the world of client side HTTP libraries we're expecting >that HTTP/2 will not supplant HTTP/1.1. We're not even sure that >HTTP/2 will become the default. Or for that matter: If HTTP/2 will be an improvement in the first place. I've yet to see any numbers that justify technical cost of the added complexity. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 12:50:39 UTC