Re: [perpass] HTTP user-agent fingerprinting

On 13 September 2013 15:41, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> An alternative possible approach could build on the typed codec work..
> that is, use compact opaque binary values for user agent as an
> alternative to the current string-based value. For those who need the
> backwards compatibility, the legacy string values would still be
> available and usable.. but we'd have a simple transition path for
> something better.

As it pertains to tracking, I don't see an opaque binary blob to have
characteristics different from a string.  It does make the identifier
less useful for the aforementioned purposes, which leads me to
conclude that something like that would be lose-lose.

Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 22:48:46 UTC