W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:54:33 +0100
Message-ID: <51471C99.7070704@gmx.de>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2013-03-18 14:01, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Hi,
>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06
> I think it would be good to reference "IANA HTTP Authentication Scheme
> Registry" earlier in the document, e.g. a "[authschemes]" reference in
> the Introduction. If "Hypertext Transfer Protocol" is then struck from
> the Introduction, it would even be a little bit different from the text
> in the Abstract, which would be a good and necessary thing.

The sole purpose of this document is to instruct IANA to perform 
registrations. I don't think that we need to spend time tuning the prose 
of the abstract.

> In Appendix A the formatting of the table is confusing, there should be
> an empty or "---" line to separate rows (e.g., is "Bearer Digest" one

That's what xml2rfc produces. Also: see above.

> scheme? That's not immediately clear). I also note "Bearer" does not in-
> dicate a section number while the others do.

Can you suggest a specific section it *should* reference?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 13:55:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:10 UTC