- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:24:12 +0000
- To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
- cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <em2c99bf04-f567-48b2-b6c9-34d6777aad66@bombed>, "Adrien W. de Croy" writes: >>It very much is: A cache would have to be stupid to make that >>assumption, and we should not be protecting stupid mistakes with >>the specification, we should make things work. >it was just one example. There are potentially limitless ones. > >fundamentally, we're changing the semantics. No, at most we're changing the text. The HTTP sematics is whatever is in used out there on the big bad net... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 12:24:38 UTC