- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:10:17 -0800
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 19 February 2013 12:45, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Right now I believe we allow a wider encoding for HTTP keys than is > necessary. Actually, you might be able to get the acceptable set down to a lot less. 64 seems relatively easy, and that still allows for both upper and lower case. > Does anyone know of any non-crazy use for character values > 127 in the > header keys (because I really can't think of any)? I can't. That doesn't mean that someone else wont think their reason non-crazy.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 21:10:45 UTC