W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 next steps and TLS next protocol negotiation

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:36:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNf2cC07wM2XjKnfWO7Hbxv8=+zM+hSkDWzHydUQXn-rSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
*shrug*
These seem to say the same thing in different words?
-=R


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH) <
Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:

> The proposed plan (
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JanMar/0577.html)
> for TLS next protocol negotiation in the HTTP/2.0 implementation draft is
> to "use NPN (until TLSWG gives us something to replace it with) for TLS
> connections".
>
> Based on Eric Rescorla's recent message on the TLS mailing list -
> Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols - (
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg09176.html)  which
> states:
>
>         Depending on list discussion and what other proposals appear, we
> may attempt to select a proposal in Orlando.
>
> I'd like to slightly amend the plan to indicate that the initial HTTP/2.0
> implementation draft will use the negotiation proposal selected in Orlando
> by the TLS WG. If none is selected, then we will use NPN (until TLSWG gives
> us something to replace it with) for TLS connections.
>
> Comments?
>
> Brian Raymor
> Senior Program Manager
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:37:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:37:28 GMT