W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:26:57 +0100
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wr6ey7e2iw9drz@uranium.westinmy-starwoodgp.com>
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:47:08 +0100, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>  
wrote:

>
> The Frame format:
>
>          0                   1
>          0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
>         +-+-+-----------+---------------+
>         |F|C|  type     |               |
>         +-+-+-----------+               +
>         |        Frame Length (24)      |
>         +-------------------------------+
>         |       opaque ID (16)          |
>         +-------------------------------+
>         |     Frame Data (16...N)       |
>         +-------------------------------+
>

Since the flow only ends once, isn't an end-of-flow control type more  
efficient use of bits than a flag?

/Martin Nilsson
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 07:27:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 8 February 2013 07:27:29 GMT