Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

Not in cases where one side of a flow often closes after one control frame,
e.g. most HTTP GETs
-=R


On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:47:08 +0100, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
>
>> The Frame format:
>>
>>          0                   1
>>          0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
>>         +-+-+-----------+-------------**--+
>>         |F|C|  type     |               |
>>         +-+-+-----------+               +
>>         |        Frame Length (24)      |
>>         +-----------------------------**--+
>>         |       opaque ID (16)          |
>>         +-----------------------------**--+
>>         |     Frame Data (16...N)       |
>>         +-----------------------------**--+
>>
>>
> Since the flow only ends once, isn't an end-of-flow control type more
> efficient use of bits than a flag?
>
> /Martin Nilsson
>
>