W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:40:25 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <58151.1360150825@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
--------
In message <C6B30EDB-32FB-4093-AD74-4B596FC4F0D2@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
tes:

>> I don't think this is good enough.
>> 
>> You'd need ~20k of these frames a second to fill a 10GB ethernet,
>> and a very large fraction of present day web-objects would require
>> more than one frame already.
>
>Could you please spell out why you think that's a problem?

As I said before:  If we cannot demonstrate HTTP/2 on a 10GE
media and argue plausibly that it can be handled on 1Tbit/sec,
we're writing a standard for the past and not the future.

Matt Mathis has been pushing similar agenda for IP MTU for years now:

	http://staff.psc.edu/mathis/MTU/

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:40:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:40:51 GMT