W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:58:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdrkXbRrUtDJhvHVYq=edpUt=_163pT7g6sQo=WGv0DmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
What he said :)
-=R


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> ... and looking at Browser Hints (or at least the cut-down revision that I
> haven't submitted yet), there's not an obvious win (yet).
>
> How about we punt on this aspect of the record for now? Maybe leave an
> opaque blob in the record for (potential) later use?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 06/02/2013, at 8:33 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I suspect that several of the settings (compression state, flow control,
> etc) are simply going to be too dynamic for us to rely on DNS.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It will in certain use-cases, e.g. restarting a browser with many open
> tabs, using a webapp or native application accessing a remote site, or when
> a service is experiencing heavy load (it may decrease the max compression
> state size), etc.
> > -=R
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/5/13 10:06 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
> >> I don't remember BDP being one of these, though we did have discussion
> that talked about BDP in relation to some of the settings.
> >> These were more along the lines of max-concurrent-streams,
> max-compressor-state-size, and various other HTTP/2 specific settings that
> the client should know about/respect.
> >
> > Ok, next question: given that we're mandating a settings frame as part
> of connection initialization (at least I think we agreed on that), does
> putting this stuff in DNS save anything?
> >
> > Eliot
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:59:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:59:22 GMT