W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:17:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcxifHmO3ne4v_bfv6L8_jrdUCv5xstLX9tAnF5Pi9cHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It will in certain use-cases, e.g. restarting a browser with many open
tabs, using a webapp or native application accessing a remote site, or when
a service is experiencing heavy load (it may decrease the max compression
state size), etc.
-=R


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> On 2/5/13 10:06 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
>
> I don't remember BDP being one of these, though we did have discussion
> that talked about BDP in relation to some of the settings.
> These were more along the lines of max-concurrent-streams,
> max-compressor-state-size, and various other HTTP/2 specific settings that
> the client should know about/respect.
>
>
> Ok, next question: given that we're mandating a settings frame as part of
> connection initialization (at least I think we agreed on that), does
> putting this stuff in DNS save anything?
>
> Eliot
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:18:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:18:21 GMT