W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:14:00 +0100
Message-ID: <51117618.2060601@cisco.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 2/5/13 10:06 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
> I don't remember BDP being one of these, though we did have discussion
> that talked about BDP in relation to some of the settings.
> These were more along the lines of max-concurrent-streams,
> max-compressor-state-size, and various other HTTP/2 specific settings
> that the client should know about/respect.

Ok, next question: given that we're mandating a settings frame as part
of connection initialization (at least I think we agreed on that), does
putting this stuff in DNS save anything?

Eliot
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:14:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:14:31 GMT