W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?

From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:26:37 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOi3UV4aa0Jh5JDd00YysuTfpU8ZM9K9YbvHSOJksWo1VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>

So make the HTTP/2.0 equivalent of Request-Line have the URI scheme,
host name FQDN, and URI local part all contiguous, trivially
separated/parsed (e.g., with a length field for each, possibly a
varint length).

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:27:04 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?"
Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?"
Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?"
Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:27:07 GMT