W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:48:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfGocr9S992SQNWfW+K9Rz5f1XZcVkC7AoV5WXmxF+Pcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Dropping the host header will inflate the size of bytes on the wire, to the
detriment of latency.

I haven't yet heard of a real performance advantage for dropping it. Is
there one?

-=R


On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> --------
> In message <CA+9kkMBDT9129r=
> 2Mquzo6B1u13WuFNKemW6hoyDOF82RWXg8A@mail.gmail.com>, Ted Hardie writes:
>
> >In retrospect, it
> >is clear that we shouldn't have looked at the current installed
> >base--we should have looked at what we expected eventual use would be.
>
> A mistake this WG seems hell-bent on repeating with HTTP2 in my view...
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 22:48:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 22:48:54 GMT