On 21/01/2013, at 9:50 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > +1.. in fact, for 2.0, I'd very much like to get rid of q-values entirely and depend entirely on order. Doing that would lose information; e.g., there's no way to say q=0 in a purely ordered set. That may or may not be acceptable, but we need to talk through it. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Sunday, 20 January 2013 22:59:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 20 January 2013 22:59:33 GMT