W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:59:00 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-Id: <87E095B4-8918-41E0-A044-AEA0438D1AB1@mnot.net>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

On 21/01/2013, at 9:50 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.. in fact, for 2.0, I'd very much like to get rid of q-values entirely and depend entirely on order.

Doing that would lose information; e.g., there's no way to say q=0 in a purely ordered set. 

That may or may not be acceptable, but we need to talk through it.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 20 January 2013 22:59:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC