- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:59:00 +1100
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On 21/01/2013, at 9:50 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > +1.. in fact, for 2.0, I'd very much like to get rid of q-values entirely and depend entirely on order. Doing that would lose information; e.g., there's no way to say q=0 in a purely ordered set. That may or may not be acceptable, but we need to talk through it. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 20 January 2013 22:59:30 UTC