W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:21:44 +0100
Message-ID: <50F549D8.2050501@gmx.de>
To: Piotr Dobrogost <p@ietf.dobrogost.net>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2013-01-15 12:47, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> To summarize, from the point of view of http client library (see
> https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/issues/741):
> - The safe approach is to not merge any header fields with the same field name.


> - If merging, merge only those fields which are known to be safe to
> merge ie. those, which can be parsed after merging. Also, if the top
> most production in BNF specyfing field's value is #(values) it does
> NOT mean the field is safe for merging although this seems to be
> implied by the statement in the spec starting with "Multiple header
> fields with the same field name MUST NOT be sent (...)"

If a spec uses the list production but then doesn't allow proper parsing 
then that spec is buggy (such as Set-Cookie).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 12:22:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC