W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 06:58:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfL9HLGziepZoYiAgvct71r+D6ObYR-=Kd7MwT3EiB3=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
What would be helpful is the ability to define multiple compression runs
per compressor subdirectory... But the current design works fine too.
Pretty straightforward really.
On Jan 14, 2013 3:47 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Perhaps, but they're not really easy to disentangle; if people are
> interested in the different combinations, they can easily factor the
> compressor code to cover the space (as we're already starting to see with
> James' work).
>
> Cheers,
>
> (of course, if you want to tackle this, a pull request would be welcome)
>
>
> On 10/01/2013, at 11:48 PM, Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:57:01 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Quick follow-up:
> >>
> >> I posted more about this here:
> >>  http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/01/04/http2_header_compression
> >>
> >> In particular, we have graphs for all of the HAR samples I took earlier:
> >>  http://http2.github.com/http_samples/mnot/
> >>
> >
> > One minor issue is that you are comparing both encoding and compression
> at the same time. I.e. you could have a (http, spdy) x (uncompressed,
> delta, delta-huffman, gzip) result matrix.
> >
> > /Martin Nilsson
> >
> > --
> > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 14:59:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 January 2013 14:59:08 GMT