W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 01:55:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNeKot9cuZprj3aeZ3HF_H8-E40OT98x-Vh7F6HoRFr_RA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Do you have some suggestions Martin?
The obvious thing in my mind is to get submissions from site owners, but
that takes interest on their part first. :/

-=R


On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:53 AM, "Martin J. Dürst"
<duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:

> On 2013/01/06 14:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Quick follow-up:
>>
>> I posted more about this here:
>>    http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/**01/04/http2_header_compression<http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/01/04/http2_header_compression>
>>
>> In particular, we have graphs for all of the HAR samples I took earlier:
>>    http://http2.github.com/http_**samples/mnot/<http://http2.github.com/http_samples/mnot/>
>>
>
> These look very interesting. Just two points for the moment:
>
> - Drawing connected curves seems misleading, because we are not
> mesuring/showing a continuous quantity that varies over time, but discrete
> requests and responses.
>
> - The data sample includes big guys only. Some criticism of speedy has
> said that it is geared towards the big guys. Is there a way to get some
> more of an impression of how headers look at the long tail of websites?
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
>
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2013 09:55:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 January 2013 09:55:41 GMT