W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: Separate HEADERS and PRIORITY Frames, Eliminate HEADERS+PRIORITY

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 07:17:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_gM1A4Xa-xWeTzWv-DQT-vNs-ZJ-XmXLhE=aM6QE9ZxCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>wrote:

> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nah-- I've been proposing that when the continuation bit is set, you may
>> ONLY continue sending HEADERS frames for that stream until the set of
>> headers is done (at which point you can send whatever again), basically
>> because of both complexity and the DoS stuff inherent in incomplete state.
>> :)
>>
> +1 on this
>

+1 yes to this
Received on Sunday, 26 May 2013 14:18:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC