W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: Separate HEADERS and PRIORITY Frames, Eliminate HEADERS+PRIORITY

From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 18:21:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNosf2wV18caAuR20uskp82xpZH5BXYt7SNezG1aTG09=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nah-- I've been proposing that when the continuation bit is set, you may
> ONLY continue sending HEADERS frames for that stream until the set of
> headers is done (at which point you can send whatever again), basically
> because of both complexity and the DoS stuff inherent in incomplete state.
> :)
>

+1 on this
Received on Saturday, 25 May 2013 22:21:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC