W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: WGLC p1: proxy handling of a really bad Content-Length

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 01:44:33 -0600
Message-ID: <5180C7E1.3010509@measurement-factory.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
On 05/01/2013 01:26 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>     When talking about dealing with malformed responses, HTTPbis p1
>> Section 3.3.3 says:
>>> the proxy MUST discard the received response, send a 502 (Bad
>>> Gateway) status code as its downstream response, and then close the
>>> connection.
>> Which connection MUST the proxy close: upstream or downstream? If you
>> guessed downstream because the connection must be closed only _after_
>> the 502 downstream response is sent, you guessed wrong :-).
>> The proxy MUST close the upstream connection and it may do that
>> immediately, without waiting for the 502 response to be sent on the
>> downstream connection. This was discussed around 2011/11/28, and I think
>> Mark agreed that a fix is needed but the text was never changed.
>> Also, the current wording suggests sending "status code" as a response,
>> which is not the intent, of course.
>> Suggested fix:
>>   the proxy MUST close the upstream connection, discard the received
>>   response, and send a 502 (Bad Gateway) response downstream.
> I think we should never use the terms "upstream" and "downstream" since
> they're ambiguous due to the fact that connections are bidirectional.

HTTPbis defines those terms in p1 section 2.3, but I agree that their
use in a multiple connection context is kind of ambiguous (in both the
current text and the suggested fix).

> We'd rather use "connection to the client" and "connection to the server".
> So I would suggest :
>    the proxy MUST close the connection to the server, discard the received
>    response, and send a 502 (Bad Gateway) response to the client.

Sounds great to me!

Thank you,

Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 07:45:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC