W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p2: Accept-Language missing, empty or no match

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:06:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfmxuCQJkpLv1zoc93-tOAQ_7OXSd=XBDAHtJVpaswhaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
So long as vary is being used properly still, no objections here.
On Apr 29, 2013 8:24 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Anyone disagree with adding similar text to Accept-Language? If not, I'll
> mark for incorporation.
>
>
> On 20/04/2013, at 6:49 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
> > In p2, Accept, Accept-Charset and Accept-Encoding all have language
> similar to this:
> >
> >> A request without any Accept header field implies that the user agent
> will accept any media type in response. If an Accept header field is
> present in a request and none of the available representations for the
> response have a media type that is listed as acceptable, the origin server
> may either honor the Accept header field by sending a 406 (Not Acceptable)
> response or disregard the Accept header field by treating the response as
> if it is not subject to content negotiation.
> >
> > However, Accept-Language in 5.3.5 does not. Is this intentional?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2013 04:07:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC