W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: Max Concurrent Streams Limit and Unidirectional Streams

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:13:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdH+YnH2V8HX=1YzrT-m06ggdXNGqvEMwng2nDv5AeXXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yes, Outward bound only.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 April 2013 12:33, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Perhaps a simpler approach would be to just redefine the limit such
>> that an endpoint MUST NOT have more than MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS in the
>> Open state at any given time. We have already established that once
>> the stream is half-closed, new frames cannot be sent, so once the
>> server half-closes a steam it initiates, the counter is decremented
>> and the server is permitted to initiate another stream. The client can
>> choose to reject those additional streams if it chooses.
>
> Do you mean that only outward bound streams count toward the
> concurrency limit.  That could be workable; it's certainly easier to
> explain.
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 23:14:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC