W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: Max Concurrent Streams Limit and Unidirectional Streams

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:11:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVoHv+Wf=oYN=RSq2GHod-KrZ5gPq-gYmNvcRpMWFjNEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 25 April 2013 12:33, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps a simpler approach would be to just redefine the limit such
> that an endpoint MUST NOT have more than MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS in the
> Open state at any given time. We have already established that once
> the stream is half-closed, new frames cannot be sent, so once the
> server half-closes a steam it initiates, the counter is decremented
> and the server is permitted to initiate another stream. The client can
> choose to reject those additional streams if it chooses.

Do you mean that only outward bound streams count toward the
concurrency limit.  That could be workable; it's certainly easier to
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 23:11:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC