W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p1: HTTP(S) URIs and fragment identifiers

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:30:25 +1000
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AED6FBF2-724F-424B-AFC2-06A5C73F8B14@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 20/04/2013, at 5:28 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2013-04-20 06:07, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> P1 sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 define the HTTP and HTTPS URI schemes without fragment identifiers.
>> 
>> While it's true that HTTP sends these URIs without fragids "on the wire" in the request-target, the schemes *do* allow fragids pretty much everywhere else they're used (including some places in HTTP, e.g., the Location header).
>> 
>> Given that this is going to be the definition for these URI schemes, and we already require that the fragid be omitted in the request-target, shouldn't the syntax allow a fragment identifier?
> 
> No.
> 
> Fragment identifiers are allowed for *any* URI scheme; the scheme definition doesn't need to include it.


Then why do we include query?


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 07:30:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC