W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p1: HTTP(S) URIs and fragment identifiers

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:28:34 +0200
Message-ID: <517243A2.9000006@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-04-20 06:07, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> P1 sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 define the HTTP and HTTPS URI schemes without fragment identifiers.
>
> While it's true that HTTP sends these URIs without fragids "on the wire" in the request-target, the schemes *do* allow fragids pretty much everywhere else they're used (including some places in HTTP, e.g., the Location header).
>
> Given that this is going to be the definition for these URI schemes, and we already require that the fragid be omitted in the request-target, shouldn't the syntax allow a fragment identifier?

No.

Fragment identifiers are allowed for *any* URI scheme; the scheme 
definition doesn't need to include it.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 07:29:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC