W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND

From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:27:26 +0200
Message-ID: <516D51BE.1080402@cisco.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
CC: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>, Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>, Jitu Padhye <padhye@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>

On 4/16/13 3:45 AM, Patrick McManus wrote:

> Part of what you inject is traditional L4 information (what was our
> CWND before) which is much more interesting than a constant,

Much more interesting.  That much we agree on.  Whether it is
information or misinformation is the real question.

Eliot
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 13:28:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC