- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:19:33 +0000
- To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Zhong Yu" <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu> >Hi Martin, > >On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:08:01PM -0800, Martin Thomson wrote: > >> >>On 4 December 2012 15:05, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: >>>> 6. If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then >>>> the message body length is zero (no message body is present). >>> >>> I think it should simply state >>> >>> 6. If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then >>> the message contains no body. >> >>Is it really useful to distinguish between no body and body with no >>content? I can't imagine a use for such a distinction. >> > > >I think the example with the POST that is rejected without a content-length >is valid, I have already observed this one, though I don't remember on >what server. > maybe that's a bug in that server? Adrien > > >Willy > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:20:20 UTC