W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:44:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbe4r2S_2LbeyqkihwEzPnb-TrmVf5HkjP+r+jb8dawJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> On 25/10/2012, at 5:00 AM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >
> > for reference
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS_Key_Log_Format
>
> Thanks; I looked for that before, but couldn't find it. Should have asked.
>
> I agree that the logs should be 'raw'; we can always post-process (as long
> as we do it in a uniform manner :)
>
> How would people prefer to store them? I've been storing them as just text
> files, one per direction per stream (e.g., "response headers on this
> connection to 1.2.3.4"), with header blocks delimited by a blank line.
>  However, IIRC someone mentioned HAR as well -- any preferences?
>
>
text files would work just fine.

- James


>  Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 19:44:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 19:44:52 GMT