W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:33:10 +1100
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1D13DD5E-11AA-4726-80A9-A780625FE950@mnot.net>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Thanks, that's fine for now.

Cheers,


On 24/10/2012, at 3:27 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:

> Will http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol/spdy-protocol-draft2#TOC-Server-Advertisement-of-SPDY-through-the-HTTP-Alternate-Protocol-header
> do for now? I'd like to reiterate though that I'd rather people just
> use the TLS WG mechanism, whatever it is :)
> 
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On 24/10/2012, at 2:57 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> It works in practice. Alternate-Protocol is deployed and live. I'm not
>>> terribly excited about it, since I'd rather people use https:// with
>>> whatever negotiation scheme the TLS WG comes up with.
>> 
>> Would you or someone else familiar with it mind writing up a small spec for it?
>> 
>> Ideally an I-D, but an e-mail will suffice.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 
>> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 04:33:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 04:33:36 GMT