W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Link and Unlink

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:57:06 +0200
Message-ID: <5077DB62.2040508@gmx.de>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-10-08 22:28, James M Snell wrote:
> For review and comment...
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-link-method-00.txt
>
> Updated definition of LINK and UNLINK, taking RFC5988 into consideration
> and using language consistent from current httpbis draft (read:
> shamelessly and remorselessly lifted).
>
> Comments and feedback definitely welcome.

I think it would be good to consider rev= (supported? optional?) and 
anchor= (same).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 08:57:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2012 08:57:40 GMT