W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Link and Unlink

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:32:32 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <2BA23385-2E50-47BC-BD1A-BAE213F8DCDA@mnot.net>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Personally, I'm -0 on this; I don't see demand for it yet, and we're really just learning how to build link-driven HTTP APIs. YMMV (in which case I'd be glad to hear about detailed use cases!).

Cheers,


On 09/10/2012, at 7:28 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> For review and comment...
> 
>   http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-link-method-00.txt
> 
> Updated definition of LINK and UNLINK, taking RFC5988 into consideration and using language consistent from current httpbis draft (read: shamelessly and remorselessly lifted).  
> 
> Comments and feedback definitely welcome.
> 
> - James
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 20:33:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2012 20:33:04 GMT