W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: comments on draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00

From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:40:47 +0200
Message-ID: <502BDF1F.4090705@cisco.com>
To: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
CC: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 8/15/12 7:19 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) wrote:
> Can you elaborate how SRV would work here from a client perspective?
> Do you propose making the client block on the SRV lookup? Or are you
> proposing doing this out of band and switching to HTTP/2.0 if we
> discover support?

Block is the wrong word.  You're already doing A-Record queries.  Adding
another record in the question only adds latency if you must serially
query.  Also, I myself am not convinced that SRV records are sufficient
to the task.  For instance, what happens if there is a port # in the
URL?  How do you identify the version #? 

Paul Hoffman did some work on a draft that sort-of looked at this
problem.  I'm going to guess that he stopped short because of potential
downgrade attacks.

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 17:41:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:06 UTC