W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: comments on draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00

From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:00:02 -0400
Message-ID: <1345035602.1116.16.camel@ds9>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 12:24 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> If we take architecture seriously, the primary signaling mechanism for
> HTTP/2.0 should be some form of statement in a DNS record to tell the
> client 'I do HTTP 2.0'. We might also have some sort of upgrade
> mechanism for use when the DNS records are blocked but that should be
> a fallback.

This is my current thinking as well though I'm not tied to it.. srv in
the base case (with the possibility of dnssec) and something like
upgrade/alternate-protocol over HTTP/1 as a slower fallback.
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 13:00:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 15 August 2012 13:00:35 GMT