W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: FYI... Binary Optimized Header Encoding for SPDY

From: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:41:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAPAK-5vBAYhjA1rOxX4f=rGWpreFcD+r9NpGsgSNJ=O+w5jmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Section 1.4 p7: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-00.txt

That would be, after 89 bytes and SPDY, 150 bytes and 150 bits, 28 bytes
and 28 bits, 102 bytes minus 102 bits. One SPDY version uses UTF8, another
uses int32, and the one with mobility uses only 16bit words (network
friendly).


On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, James M Snell wrote:

> I have submitted an I-D describing the alternative header encoding for
> SPDY that I discussed previously. Should be pretty self-explanatory and
> there are plenty of examples given throughout. I know it still has yet to
> be decided whether SPDY will be the starting point for the HTTP/2.0 effort,
> but I wanted to make this available for discussion.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-00
>
> - James
>
>
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 01:41:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 August 2012 01:41:54 GMT