- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:04:09 +0200
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Rajeev Bector <rbector@yahoo-inc.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Doug Beaver <doug@fb.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-07-18 09:50, Mike Belshe wrote: > ... > It does not go without notice from me that the battle lines are drawn > around which type of developer you are. Browser developers and social > content providers are all in the protect-the-users camp (encrypt > everything). Proxy vendors, which have an uncertain role in an > encrypted future, are unilaterally against it. This is a power struggle > of products. Are the endpoints in charge? Or is the 3rd party > middleman in charge? > > Again, I vote for the user. > ... The user wants security. But the user also wants speed, or the ability to access a site from an environment that insists on opening the connection. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 08:04:52 UTC