- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:16:24 +0200
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-07-12 09:11, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Thanks; in the meantime I came to the conclusion that the definition of >> "condition met" for If-None-Match needs to be reversed. (The text was >> consistent, but in a confusing way). I also made the two definitions >> more consistent. >> >> Proposed patch: >> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/372/372.2.diff> > (...) >> Feedback appreciated, Julian > > The wording and use cases are very clear to me that way and I think this is > exactly what is needed ! I'd say "please don't change a word". > ... Your wish is my command: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1761> Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 10:17:05 UTC