Hi Julian, On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > Thanks; in the meantime I came to the conclusion that the definition of > "condition met" for If-None-Match needs to be reversed. (The text was > consistent, but in a confusing way). I also made the two definitions > more consistent. > > Proposed patch: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/372/372.2.diff> (...) > Feedback appreciated, Julian The wording and use cases are very clear to me that way and I think this is exactly what is needed ! I'd say "please don't change a word". Cheers, WillyReceived on Thursday, 12 July 2012 07:12:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 July 2012 07:12:36 GMT