- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:53:16 +0000
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- cc: patrick mcmanus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <CABaLYCvguj3oycrv7uGKnMK_3fUYBU02JA=eH_W_F-w=fH7Rqg@mail.gmail.com> , Mike Belshe writes: >Thats the whole point of SPDY - we just handed you a protocol which embeds >SSL but is still has lower latency than HTTP. And I want a protocol with even lower latency, by taking some of the good things about SPDY, and leaving behind the bad. >These are cheap and getting cheaper every day. "cheap is not the same as free". It's not cheap if you have to sustain a slashdotting or redditing on SSL. >The higher the RTT, the bigger the win for SPDY. So this claim is just >false. Really ? You found a way to negotiate TLS without any RTT cost ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 17:53:46 UTC