W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: HTTP 2.0/flag day

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:20:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4F7034E1.3020607@gmx.de>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-03-26 11:13, Ted Hardie wrote:
> I'm seeing a bunch of messages that seem to be based on the assumption
> that after the creation of an HTTP 2.0 that all HTTP 1.x would
> disappear in the transition to HTTP 2.0.  I am not anticipating a flag
> day here, and I would guess that HTTP 1.1 would still be around for
> any use cases that do not need features of any 2.0 proposal.  Does
> that make sense to others, or do we have a design constraint that all
> use cases currently met by HTTP 1.X must also be met (with the same
> security and performance properties) by 2.0?
> ...

That's a good question.

I expect that many people will agree that some things are not essential, 
but that it might be hard to agree on exactly which parts...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 09:21:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT