W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Re[4]: Bad browser behaviour?

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:53:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia9SE+k9d9UntbLm8OiybVySY0przVi_06+rtRS96TcEDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>  OK, so what we're saying is that the 0 chunk is basically redundant.

What if you want to send another response?  Don't you need to
terminate the first response somehow?

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> It might be worth differentiating between the download use case and normal browsing.

Yeah, there it makes sense not to truncate the response since there
isn't any incremental processing of the response.

Adam
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 05:54:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT