On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote: > OK, so what we're saying is that the 0 chunk is basically redundant. What if you want to send another response? Don't you need to terminate the first response somehow? On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > It might be worth differentiating between the download use case and normal browsing. Yeah, there it makes sense not to truncate the response since there isn't any incremental processing of the response. AdamReceived on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 05:54:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT