W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

#334: recipient behavior for new auth parameters

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:51:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4F4EAC07.4030103@gmx.de>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi there.

I recently opened (based on oauth-bearer discussions) the following ticket:

"Should we state the default behavior for extension auth-params? Is it 

Should we recommend that new schemes establish procedures for defining 
new parameters?"

The proposed change is not to define a global default (although it would 
be nice if we could), but to remind people how define new schemes to 
think about this and to document it.

Like that:

   Definitions of new schemes ought to define the treatment of unknown
   extension parameters. In general, a "must-ignore" rule is preferable
   over "must-understand", because otherwise it will be hard to introduce
   new parameters in the presence of legacy recipients.


Feedback appreciated, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC