On 02/25/2012 06:23 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-02-25 18:44, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> ... >> I don't think fixing or changing the framework will give us better >> auth schemes by itself. (Better auth schemes may or may not require >> changes to the framework, I dunno.) >> >> So I think you're raising a side issue here really. >> ... > > Well, I'm one of the editors of the authentication framework spec, so if > there's something wrong with it, I'd like to know. > > So if we collectively think that the framework probably is ok, and that > we *do* need a new authentication scheme, what's stopping us to start > that activity *right now*? I believe I answered just that question from you earlier today. So you must be looking for someone else's answer I guess. Or perhaps I'm confused. SReceived on Saturday, 25 February 2012 18:29:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:56 GMT