On 1/23/2012 10:50 PM, James Snell wrote: > The charter should make it absolutely > clear that the goal is an incremental evolution of HTTP/1.1 rather > than an opportunity for radical changes. Does it make sense, then, to designate this as an HTTP/1.2 exploration, as opposed to an outright HTTP/2.0 refactoring? Somewhere during the process, if there were a clear mandate to abandon some aspect[s] of the HTTP/1.1 spec, then the project could recharter itself to HTTP/2.0 with that narrow, well defined purpose in doing so.Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 05:01:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT