W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Advice to define where new status codes can be generated

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:56:55 +0200
Message-ID: <4FE80BB7.1040605@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-06-25 05:44, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Just a quick thought: in <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html#considerations.for.new.status.codes>, we talk about guidelines for new status codes. It might be worth advising people to explicitly say whether intermediaries can generate the status code, in addition to (or instead of) the origin.
> Make sense?

Probably yes. Is there a default though?
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 06:57:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:02 UTC