On 25/06/2012, at 4:56 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-06-25 05:44, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Just a quick thought: in <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html#considerations.for.new.status.codes>, we talk about guidelines for new status codes. It might be worth advising people to explicitly say whether intermediaries can generate the status code, in addition to (or instead of) the origin. >> >> Make sense? > > Probably yes. Is there a default though? Probably "unspecified." Which implies "both." -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 00:39:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 June 2012 00:39:55 GMT