W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Advice to define where new status codes can be generated

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:39:14 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <629F79DC-E28B-491E-8D33-C229A9A68FFA@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 25/06/2012, at 4:56 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-06-25 05:44, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Just a quick thought: in <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html#considerations.for.new.status.codes>, we talk about guidelines for new status codes. It might be worth advising people to explicitly say whether intermediaries can generate the status code, in addition to (or instead of) the origin.
>> 
>> Make sense?
> 
> Probably yes. Is there a default though?


Probably "unspecified." Which implies "both."

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 00:39:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 June 2012 00:39:55 GMT