Re: New Version Notification for draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status-00.txt from Tim Bray on 2012-06-13 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:20:12 -0700
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivn+sA_mFTrOncxk8-LZzOWsuOcFUyivornfPD6D+2xfQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

If the client retries the request, it might indeed work again -- depending
> on what network path they're using, etc. That's why all of the
> intermediation-focused errors are in 5xx.
>

Hm?  Surely the expectation would be the opposite; legislative/legal
changes typically have timeframes measured in years or at the quickest
months.   -T

Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 15:20:44 UTC